{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-1984-s-582",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:a7eb285e05bc7d94600d9e4543291b9564073939380a57d04e99ea0084605024",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "NJA 1984 s. 582, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-nja-1984-s-582",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-1984-s-582",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "NJA 1984 s. 582, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Arvsskattemål.",
    "Vad domstolen sa: Sedan P avlidit, har vid skattläggningen efter henne anledning ansetts saknas till antagande att vid tillkomsten av förklaringen om arvsavstående något annat var avsett än att avståendet skulle genomföras på det sätt som senare kom till uttryck genom reverserna.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta domstolen, 1984. Tillämpar Ärvdabalken."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-1984-s-582",
  "softwareVersion": "55e5f158fc60f66d",
  "citation": "avgorande-nja-1984-s-582, NJA 1984 s. 582, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-1984-s-582 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:1b63d3c0dce8d4b4, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-1984-s-582/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:a7eb285e05bc7d94600d9e4543291b9564073939380a57d04e99ea0084605024",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:a7eb285e05bc7d94600d9e4543291b9564073939380a57d04e99ea0084605024",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T11:11:16.155Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-1984-s-582",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}