{ "attribution": { "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com", "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-1984-s-176", "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision", "version": "legal-2026-08-25", "proof": "sha256:91984f61f44d6442d92be068603de88751237ba8e9fd43e55f1bb3fc87fcef90", "jurisdiction": "eu" }, "id": "avgorande-nja-1984-s-176", "kind": "avgorande", "node": { "path": "/juridik/praxis/nja-1984-s-176", "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-1984-s-176" }, "title": "NJA 1984 s. 176, beslutsagent", "title_sv": "NJA 1984 s. 176, beslutsagent", "title_en": "NJA 1984 s. 176, decision agent", "core_question": null, "points": [ { "key": "happened", "label": "Vad som hände", "text": "Arvsskattemål.", "derived": false }, { "key": "held", "label": "Vad domstolen sa", "text": "Den omständigheten att det med hänsyn till innehållet i ett vid den ursprungliga bouppteckningen fogat äktenskapsförord hade varit möjligt att uppmärksamma felaktigheten redan vid inregistreringen av denna bouppteckning har inte ansetts utgöra skäl att underlåta efterbeskattning på grundval av tilläggsbouppteckningen. 32 § d) lagen om arvsskatt och gåvoskatt.", "derived": false }, { "key": "matters", "label": "Varför det spelar roll", "text": "Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta domstolen, 1984. Tillämpar Ärvdabalken.", "derived": true } ], "risk_profile": { "level": "hog", "label": "Hög", "score": 4, "meaning": "Avgörandet väger tungt när det åberopas. Skälen nedan visar vad nivån vilar på.", "reasons": [ "Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta domstolen", "Tillämpar en författning", "117 andra avgöranden i registret tillämpar samma författning" ], "derived_from": [ "court", "act_count", "sibling_cases" ] }, "context": "Detta avgörande används i frågor om familj och migration.", "graph": { "total": 9, "acts": [ { "label": "Ärvdabalken", "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/kalla/arvdabalken", "via": "SFS 1958:637" } ], "questions": [], "cases": [ { "label": "NJA 2025:44", "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2025-44", "via": "SFS 1958:637" }, { "label": "NJA 2025:3", "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2025-3", "via": "SFS 1958:637" }, { "label": "RH 2025:7", "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2025-7", "via": "SFS 1958:637" }, { "label": "NJA 2024:57", "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2024-57", "via": "SFS 1958:637" }, { "label": "RH 2024:46", "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2024-46", "via": "SFS 1958:637" }, { "label": "RH 2024:36", "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2024-36", "via": "SFS 1958:637" }, { "label": "NJA 2024:30", "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2024-30", "via": "SFS 1958:637" }, { "label": "NJA 2024:24", "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2024-24", "via": "SFS 1958:637" } ] }, "commands": [ { "name": "runCaseSummary()", "description": "Kärnfrågan och avgörandet i tre punkter, ordagrant ur referatet.", "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-1984-s-176/manifest.json", "deterministic": true }, { "name": "runLegalImpact()", "description": "Riskprofil, lagrum och de avgöranden som tillämpar samma författning.", "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-1984-s-176/ai.json", "deterministic": true }, { "name": "runObligationCheck()", "description": "Deterministisk prövning av om avgörandet är vägledande för din fråga.", "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-1984-s-176/run?samma_lagrum=true&samma_instans=true&avgorande_ar_senare=false", "deterministic": true }, { "name": "runProofVerify()", "description": "Kontroll av att hashen du citerar hör till den här noden.", "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-1984-s-176/verify", "deterministic": true } ], "deterministic": true, "llm_used": false, "engine": { "version": "agent-engine-1", "hash": "sha256:0a4bd50d21f8ec9be383fc091511008b76ad61909cbfb674eab56fe567fbd7a0" }, "register": "Vägledande avgöranden, Sveriges Domstolar, och det svenska källregistret", "read_at": "2026-08-29", "related": { "cases": [ "/juridik/praxis/nja-2025-44", "/juridik/praxis/nja-2025-3", "/juridik/praxis/rh-2025-7", "/juridik/praxis/nja-2024-57", "/juridik/praxis/rh-2024-46", "/juridik/praxis/rh-2024-36", "/juridik/praxis/nja-2024-30", "/juridik/praxis/nja-2024-24" ], "acts": [ "/juridik/kalla/arvdabalken" ], "questions": [] }, "spi": { "call": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-1984-s-176/run", "method": "GET", "inputs": [ { "name": "samma_lagrum", "kind": "boolean", "label": "Frågan gäller ett av de lagrum avgörandet tillämpar", "labelEn": "The question concerns one of the provisions the decision applies" }, { "name": "samma_instans", "kind": "boolean", "label": "Ärendet prövas i samma instans", "labelEn": "The matter is heard by the same court" }, { "name": "avgorande_ar_senare", "kind": "boolean", "label": "Ett senare avgörande finns i samma fråga", "labelEn": "A later decision exists on the same question" } ], "output": [ "matched", "outcome", "trace", "missing", "facts", "hash" ], "quota": "60 anrop per minut och klient", "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering" }, "artifacts": { "manifest": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-1984-s-176/manifest.json", "script": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-1984-s-176/script.json", "ai": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-1984-s-176/ai.json", "run": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-1984-s-176/run", "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-1984-s-176/verify" }, "hashes": { "node": "sha256:d9af296fa7a54d89ad0a461aee7b470dd922d57217ec0e7df3bd5978b1163a17", "script": "sha256:79fd8cab15df28e60ce41cf6cbc76252925a79d7b75d2aa6ea8e7b1dc2ce1e2b", "engine": "sha256:0a4bd50d21f8ec9be383fc091511008b76ad61909cbfb674eab56fe567fbd7a0", "agent": "sha256:6ac48535e4da3b8312402ca1886f46db98dc315a0afb7346c718bdb9a1470205" }, "version": "legal-2026-08-25", "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-1984-s-176", "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.", "citation": "avgorande-nja-1984-s-176, NJA 1984 s. 176, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-1984-s-176 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:c7c86f5ef78caa7f, bygge legal-2026-08-25).", "language": "sv", "source_language": "sv", "text_language": "sv", "available_languages": [ "sv", "en", "no", "de" ], "translated_views": [ "manifest.json", "ai.json" ], "source_only_views": [ "script.json", "run", "monitor.json", "verify" ], "translated": false, "hash": "sha256:91984f61f44d6442d92be068603de88751237ba8e9fd43e55f1bb3fc87fcef90", "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z", "dependency": { "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00", "content_hash": "sha256:91984f61f44d6442d92be068603de88751237ba8e9fd43e55f1bb3fc87fcef90", "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T12:13:06.868Z", "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600, "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index", "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency", "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify", "stale_copy_invalid": true }, "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering" }