{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2026-7",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:0c4775f69304c9e04334822b30f580f228a6f646bf386b671923c52c67052224",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "MIG 2026:7, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-mig-2026-7",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2026-7",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "MIG 2026:7, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Den arbetsförmåga som ska beaktas vid bedömningen av om det finns särskilda skäl att göra undantag från försörjningskravet för permanent uppehållstillstånd är enbart sådan som skulle kunna leda till en anställning på den öppna arbetsmarknaden.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Migrationsöverdomstolen, 2026. Tillämpar Utlänningslagen."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2026-7",
  "softwareVersion": "fa61958f79a1e340",
  "citation": "avgorande-mig-2026-7, MIG 2026:7, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2026-7 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:849e1127c7636cdd, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/mig-2026-7/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:0c4775f69304c9e04334822b30f580f228a6f646bf386b671923c52c67052224",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:0c4775f69304c9e04334822b30f580f228a6f646bf386b671923c52c67052224",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T09:10:01.760Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2026-7",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}