{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2025-11",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:3f1cf058e2cd651d3fccdde03cea4f1e7df453dd4bb2b29b2e51f6bd7074d306",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "MIG 2025:11, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-mig-2025-11",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2025-11",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "MIG 2025:11, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: En EES-medborgare som gjort sig skyldig till grovt brott mot knivförbudslagen har kunnat utvisas av hänsyn till allmän ordning, eftersom hans eget beteende utgjort ett verkligt, faktiskt och tillräckligt allvarligt hot mot ett grundläggande samhällsintresse.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Migrationsöverdomstolen, 2025. Tillämpar Utlänningslagen."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2025-11",
  "softwareVersion": "39e7fec940e6f6a0",
  "citation": "avgorande-mig-2025-11, MIG 2025:11, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2025-11 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:161b51dfa92042b0, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/mig-2025-11/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:3f1cf058e2cd651d3fccdde03cea4f1e7df453dd4bb2b29b2e51f6bd7074d306",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:3f1cf058e2cd651d3fccdde03cea4f1e7df453dd4bb2b29b2e51f6bd7074d306",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T09:10:31.517Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2025-11",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}