{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2021-5",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:69e12fd7df215576ac06f0b2c47d49316634e6cdbdfba0f403fb862e433c5fd8",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "MIG 2021:5, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-mig-2021-5",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2021-5",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "MIG 2021:5, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: En kvotflykting ska undantas från det försörjningskrav som gäller enligt den tillfälliga lagen, när det på grund av särskilda omständigheter är objektivt sett ursäktligt att ansökan om familjeåterförening lämnas in efter att tremånadersfristen har löpt ut.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Migrationsöverdomstolen, 2021. Tillämpar Utlänningslagen."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2021-5",
  "softwareVersion": "9e8f3042a29c48aa",
  "citation": "avgorande-mig-2021-5, MIG 2021:5, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2021-5 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:3cd7e841790232b9, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/mig-2021-5/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:69e12fd7df215576ac06f0b2c47d49316634e6cdbdfba0f403fb862e433c5fd8",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:69e12fd7df215576ac06f0b2c47d49316634e6cdbdfba0f403fb862e433c5fd8",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T06:09:39.373Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2021-5",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}