{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2021-15",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:8be8453065d5f83af7c981a4d026fc6afa5359493bdbda20b796cc9b4a17231f",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "MIG 2021:15, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-mig-2021-15",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2021-15",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "MIG 2021:15, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Det finns förutsättningar att förordna ett offentligt biträde för en utlänning som är utvisad av allmän domstol på grund av brott och som därefter ansöker om asyl när ansökan ska prövas enligt12 kap. 19 b § fjärde stycket utlänningslagen.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Migrationsöverdomstolen, 2021. Tillämpar Utlänningslagen."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2021-15",
  "softwareVersion": "cbf92758bac5156b",
  "citation": "avgorande-mig-2021-15, MIG 2021:15, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2021-15 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:f8462b92dae6c643, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/mig-2021-15/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:8be8453065d5f83af7c981a4d026fc6afa5359493bdbda20b796cc9b4a17231f",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:8be8453065d5f83af7c981a4d026fc6afa5359493bdbda20b796cc9b4a17231f",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T06:12:57.604Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2021-15",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}