{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2021-14",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:b4254c75679c3511acb9141b8b5246e65aa48b5bed29bd16cd087b083eb53177",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "MIG 2021:14, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-mig-2021-14",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2021-14",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "MIG 2021:14, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Det har funnits förutsättningar att återkalla en alternativ skyddsstatusförklaring när de omständigheter som ledde till att skyddsstatus beviljades inte kvarstår, och det inte heller finns andra omständigheter som medför att skydd fortfarande behövs.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Migrationsöverdomstolen, 2021. Tillämpar Utlänningslagen."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2021-14",
  "softwareVersion": "451cafa4b85e8b67",
  "citation": "avgorande-mig-2021-14, MIG 2021:14, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2021-14 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:079192be90a2bdb4, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/mig-2021-14/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:b4254c75679c3511acb9141b8b5246e65aa48b5bed29bd16cd087b083eb53177",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:b4254c75679c3511acb9141b8b5246e65aa48b5bed29bd16cd087b083eb53177",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T09:11:35.788Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2021-14",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}