{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2020-11",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:64aa48c964b0392642d8c55ab5ed01476196afad9f159adfda32dda1adeda994",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "MIG 2020:11, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-mig-2020-11",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2020-11",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "MIG 2020:11, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: När uppehållstillstånd övervägs i ett säkerhetsärende, måste inte bara en prövning av frågan om uteslutning göras utan även en prövning av om det finns grund för att vägra utlänningen statusförklaring eller uppehållstillstånd.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Migrationsöverdomstolen, 2020. Tillämpar Utlänningslagen."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2020-11",
  "softwareVersion": "9b71848afd6af3d6",
  "citation": "avgorande-mig-2020-11, MIG 2020:11, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2020-11 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:e9b0f6720b01c3db, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/mig-2020-11/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:64aa48c964b0392642d8c55ab5ed01476196afad9f159adfda32dda1adeda994",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:64aa48c964b0392642d8c55ab5ed01476196afad9f159adfda32dda1adeda994",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T06:12:21.240Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2020-11",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}