{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2019-8",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:1d8ef137fe0aa2187ef5e492240247eb02a7ddd8276c7517e20a14afefa72faf",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "MIG 2019:8, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-mig-2019-8",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2019-8",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "MIG 2019:8, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: När Migrationsverket har återkallat eller upphävt en utlännings Schengenvisering och Polismyndigheten har fattat ett beslut om avvisning av utlänningen ska ett överklagande av avvisningsbeslutet prövas av Migrationsverket som första instans.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Migrationsöverdomstolen, 2019. Tillämpar Utlänningslagen."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2019-8",
  "softwareVersion": "89e646e11f3a9a90",
  "citation": "avgorande-mig-2019-8, MIG 2019:8, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2019-8 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:6ff75eb601f6af54, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/mig-2019-8/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:1d8ef137fe0aa2187ef5e492240247eb02a7ddd8276c7517e20a14afefa72faf",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:1d8ef137fe0aa2187ef5e492240247eb02a7ddd8276c7517e20a14afefa72faf",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T10:59:53.396Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2019-8",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}