{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2019-6",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:46722c0df4622f46328d7cd462f1ed167256c061d22ced9e597670e50763df98",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "MIG 2019:6, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-mig-2019-6",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2019-6",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "MIG 2019:6, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Den tid en tredjelandsmedborgare som haft härledd uppehållsrätt suttit frihetsberövad som häktad och därefter avtjänat fängelsestraff kan inte beaktas vare sig vid bedömningen av permanent uppehållsrätt eller vid bedömningen av bibehållen uppehållsrätt.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Migrationsöverdomstolen, 2019. Tillämpar Utlänningslagen."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2019-6",
  "softwareVersion": "eb81bf5aee372446",
  "citation": "avgorande-mig-2019-6, MIG 2019:6, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2019-6 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:5ab47cfa063d28ed, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/mig-2019-6/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:46722c0df4622f46328d7cd462f1ed167256c061d22ced9e597670e50763df98",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:46722c0df4622f46328d7cd462f1ed167256c061d22ced9e597670e50763df98",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T09:09:49.714Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2019-6",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}