{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2018-22",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:ec47f09a8fb5d9c94d6b9a7fb67cccab3cc9efdff3b91b031252d124366564bf",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "MIG 2018:22, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-mig-2018-22",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2018-22",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "MIG 2018:22, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: När en tredjelandsmedborgare som är familjemedlem till en unionsmedborgare ansöker om visering kan det inte ställas orimliga krav på vad som krävs för att visa att rörlighetsdirektivet är tillämpligt.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Migrationsöverdomstolen, 2018. Tillämpar Utlänningslagen."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2018-22",
  "softwareVersion": "5ac6f03d6fefd939",
  "citation": "avgorande-mig-2018-22, MIG 2018:22, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2018-22 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:61a66bfb6c4e4185, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/mig-2018-22/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:ec47f09a8fb5d9c94d6b9a7fb67cccab3cc9efdff3b91b031252d124366564bf",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:ec47f09a8fb5d9c94d6b9a7fb67cccab3cc9efdff3b91b031252d124366564bf",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T10:58:51.263Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2018-22",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}