{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2017-8",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:20c6979ca3f3050475e79b6297e1d4dce68c479a625e9b4550b89ffe4756f950",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "MIG 2017:8, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-mig-2017-8",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2017-8",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "MIG 2017:8, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Vid bedömningen av om uppehållstillstånd bör beviljas en utlänning som gör gällande att han eller hon har sin försörjning ordnad på annat sätt än genom anställning måste en sammanvägning av samtliga omständigheter i det enskilda fallet göras.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Migrationsöverdomstolen, 2017. Tillämpar Utlänningslagen."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2017-8",
  "softwareVersion": "02b3dd00185809f1",
  "citation": "avgorande-mig-2017-8, MIG 2017:8, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2017-8 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:c29bf5ad056eb44c, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/mig-2017-8/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:20c6979ca3f3050475e79b6297e1d4dce68c479a625e9b4550b89ffe4756f950",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:20c6979ca3f3050475e79b6297e1d4dce68c479a625e9b4550b89ffe4756f950",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T06:03:33.492Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2017-8",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}