{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2017-10",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:06c2103a85dbd76e15d2222e1e12a9f08e79a90913207c4a23efc6ca91a7c0a9",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "MIG 2017:10, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-mig-2017-10",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2017-10",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "MIG 2017:10, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Dispens från kravet på styrkt identitet vid ansökan om svenskt medborgarskap kan medges när det inte rimligen kan krävas av den sökande att denne uppsöker sitt hemlands ambassad eller reser till hemlandet för att skaffa giltig passhandling och det inte heller finns andra möjligheter för denne att styrka sin identitet.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Migrationsöverdomstolen, 2017. Tillämpar Medborgarskapslagen."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2017-10",
  "softwareVersion": "814cc3e890d94189",
  "citation": "avgorande-mig-2017-10, MIG 2017:10, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2017-10 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:5e6a34e24634cd97, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/mig-2017-10/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:06c2103a85dbd76e15d2222e1e12a9f08e79a90913207c4a23efc6ca91a7c0a9",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:06c2103a85dbd76e15d2222e1e12a9f08e79a90913207c4a23efc6ca91a7c0a9",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T07:10:47.765Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2017-10",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}