{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2016-9",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:ce5ea2b5a798e42d1070236b0fb67ab74c529843b22fdea2aad57c6a756ff9aa",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "MIG 2016:9, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-mig-2016-9",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2016-9",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "MIG 2016:9, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Ett utländskt barn kan inte beviljas uppehållstillstånd på grund av anknytning till en förälder som har uppehållsrätt men inte uppehållstillstånd, eftersom en sådan utlänning inte kan vara anknytningsperson.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Migrationsöverdomstolen, 2016. Tillämpar Utlänningslagen."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2016-9",
  "softwareVersion": "abf4ff7b3ea662eb",
  "citation": "avgorande-mig-2016-9, MIG 2016:9, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2016-9 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:326cd649498d3752, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/mig-2016-9/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:ce5ea2b5a798e42d1070236b0fb67ab74c529843b22fdea2aad57c6a756ff9aa",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:ce5ea2b5a798e42d1070236b0fb67ab74c529843b22fdea2aad57c6a756ff9aa",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T07:04:15.494Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2016-9",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}