{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2015-18",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:3f1acb3c0d64f13d0f15bd580e9fbf8f5c2f2843478584128151f54654dfa50a",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "MIG 2015:18, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-mig-2015-18",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2015-18",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "MIG 2015:18, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Flyktingstatusförklaring kan inte beviljas en utlänning enbart på grund av att en familjemedlem har beviljats uppehållstillstånd som flykting, utan det måste alltid göras en individuell bedömning av risken för förföljelse.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Migrationsöverdomstolen, 2015. Tillämpar Utlänningslagen."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2015-18",
  "softwareVersion": "0baba93b76971f1a",
  "citation": "avgorande-mig-2015-18, MIG 2015:18, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2015-18 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:da430ee8ea75418e, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/mig-2015-18/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:3f1acb3c0d64f13d0f15bd580e9fbf8f5c2f2843478584128151f54654dfa50a",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:3f1acb3c0d64f13d0f15bd580e9fbf8f5c2f2843478584128151f54654dfa50a",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T07:15:46.502Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2015-18",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}