{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2015-12",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:696d92d04f9c744164dc3c1ac951531c8e5e6b6c289ca61b202549863697f036",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "MIG 2015:12, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-mig-2015-12",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2015-12",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "MIG 2015:12, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Möjligheten att avvisa en asylansökan med hänvisning till att den sökande har en sådan anknytning till ett annat land än sitt hemland att det är rimligt för honom eller henne att resa dit (säkert tredjeland) följer ett eget system som bygger på asylprocedurdirektivet.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Migrationsöverdomstolen, 2015. Tillämpar Utlänningslagen."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2015-12",
  "softwareVersion": "c6e91c93e5accea4",
  "citation": "avgorande-mig-2015-12, MIG 2015:12, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2015-12 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:4ebe9b60361c9855, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/mig-2015-12/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:696d92d04f9c744164dc3c1ac951531c8e5e6b6c289ca61b202549863697f036",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:696d92d04f9c744164dc3c1ac951531c8e5e6b6c289ca61b202549863697f036",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T07:14:41.083Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2015-12",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}