{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2014-22",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:7c235f46d4c282cfa32996dfe123be393cd99f5928624138e9be42c81e97e456",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "MIG 2014:22, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-mig-2014-22",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2014-22",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "MIG 2014:22, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Migrationsverkets och migrationsdomstolens utredningsansvar liksom de principer som gäller för bevisning måste beaktas vid bedömningen av om det är uppenbart att det inte finns grund för att bevilja uppehållstillstånd.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Migrationsöverdomstolen, 2014. Tillämpar Utlänningslagen."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2014-22",
  "softwareVersion": "4167be98610f35af",
  "citation": "avgorande-mig-2014-22, MIG 2014:22, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2014-22 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:6d14d9bb3e21c5c8, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/mig-2014-22/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:7c235f46d4c282cfa32996dfe123be393cd99f5928624138e9be42c81e97e456",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:7c235f46d4c282cfa32996dfe123be393cd99f5928624138e9be42c81e97e456",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T09:06:46.033Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2014-22",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}