{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2010-7",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:4f361714b73cf1111d6af8cd64864fd48dcc5961a1f222b51f8638d0832fa41a",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "MIG 2010:7, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-mig-2010-7",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2010-7",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "MIG 2010:7, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: När ett avlägsnandebeslut har preskriberats och utlänningen därefter ansöker om asyl på nytt och åberopar skyddsskäl gäller presumtionen att utlänningen har rätt till bistånd av ett offentligt biträde.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Migrationsöverdomstolen, 2010. Tillämpar Utlänningslagen."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2010-7",
  "softwareVersion": "6024f7de0254733b",
  "citation": "avgorande-mig-2010-7, MIG 2010:7, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2010-7 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:bdc21ac43918c109, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/mig-2010-7/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:4f361714b73cf1111d6af8cd64864fd48dcc5961a1f222b51f8638d0832fa41a",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:4f361714b73cf1111d6af8cd64864fd48dcc5961a1f222b51f8638d0832fa41a",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T09:06:39.293Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2010-7",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}