{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2007-46",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:3356d337490760fd6e107a6c701c5d191f491119f57de65a41a3286c85afdf07",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "MIG 2007:46, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-mig-2007-46",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2007-46",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "MIG 2007:46, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: När ett avlägsnandebeslut har preskriberats på grund av att utlänningen hållit sig undan verkställighet, uppträtt under falsk identitet eller på annat sätt bidragit till att beslutet inte kunnat verkställas kan ett nytt utvisningsbeslut meddelas.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Migrationsöverdomstolen, 2007. Tillämpar Utlänningslagen."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2007-46",
  "softwareVersion": "34640ca049fbd643",
  "citation": "avgorande-mig-2007-46, MIG 2007:46, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2007-46 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:f6e037c068e42aa6, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/mig-2007-46/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:3356d337490760fd6e107a6c701c5d191f491119f57de65a41a3286c85afdf07",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:3356d337490760fd6e107a6c701c5d191f491119f57de65a41a3286c85afdf07",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T10:58:14.081Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2007-46",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}