{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2007-20",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:82bda7e2ab172a5422fdfdb4bbb785f28a00b59ebcb09ba930bc40dfdc5f90fb",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "MIG 2007:20, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-mig-2007-20",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2007-20",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "MIG 2007:20, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Vid prövning av en ansökan om uppehållstillstånd då skyddsskäl åberopas är det viktigt att migrationsdomstolarna prövar om det kan finnas anledning att förordna om sekretess för känsliga uppgifter som annars kan medföra att flyktingskap \"sur place\" uppkommer.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Migrationsöverdomstolen, 2007. Tillämpar Utlänningslagen."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2007-20",
  "softwareVersion": "89a5c9d52bdcda87",
  "citation": "avgorande-mig-2007-20, MIG 2007:20, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2007-20 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:0f75a44b2ddbd05a, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/mig-2007-20/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:82bda7e2ab172a5422fdfdb4bbb785f28a00b59ebcb09ba930bc40dfdc5f90fb",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:82bda7e2ab172a5422fdfdb4bbb785f28a00b59ebcb09ba930bc40dfdc5f90fb",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T09:08:28.651Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2007-20",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}