{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2007-13",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:cb3819c5714201cf6ca7031b31af3947a2e91385b944e861cfdff8ebaf7e854c",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "MIG 2007:13, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-mig-2007-13",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2007-13",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "MIG 2007:13, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: I verkställighetsärende enligt 12 kap. 19 § utlänningslagen kan påstådda brister i Migrationsverkets utredning inte anses utgöra en giltig ursäkt för att inte ha åberopat omständigheter tidigare och kan därmed inte föranleda en ny prövning av frågan om uppehållstillstånd.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Migrationsöverdomstolen, 2007. Tillämpar Utlänningslagen."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2007-13",
  "softwareVersion": "9a807ba48a7436f5",
  "citation": "avgorande-mig-2007-13, MIG 2007:13, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2007-13 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:8b5102956f598b54, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/mig-2007-13/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:cb3819c5714201cf6ca7031b31af3947a2e91385b944e861cfdff8ebaf7e854c",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:cb3819c5714201cf6ca7031b31af3947a2e91385b944e861cfdff8ebaf7e854c",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T09:51:32.952Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2007-13",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}