{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/md-2009-34",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:6c74d9122823650c5a2ac0b2810d118c21fa395c027e53e9a599bc537ba7cc08",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "MD 2009:34, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-md-2009-34",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/md-2009-34",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "MD 2009:34, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Ett bolag har tillämpat avtalsvillkor rörande särskild avgift för konsumentkrediter som inneburit att bolaget istället för ränta tagit ut avgift som täckt bolagets kostnader samt genererat det dess vinst.",
    "Vad domstolen sa: Det berörda avtalsvillkoret har ansetts oskäligt enligt avtalsvillkorslagen.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Marknadsdomstolen, 2009."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/md-2009-34",
  "softwareVersion": "15c7fb43652a460c",
  "citation": "avgorande-md-2009-34, MD 2009:34, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/md-2009-34 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:60dc95e8cc5dc35d, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/md-2009-34/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:6c74d9122823650c5a2ac0b2810d118c21fa395c027e53e9a599bc537ba7cc08",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:6c74d9122823650c5a2ac0b2810d118c21fa395c027e53e9a599bc537ba7cc08",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T10:03:13.050Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/md-2009-34",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}