{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/md-2005-29",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:a9f69a9a3fb8bbec669ab8425716d810795255b680363fbee8664c99468b4207",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "MD 2005:29, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-md-2005-29",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/md-2005-29",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "MD 2005:29, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: En talan om påstått missbruk av dominerande ställning genom s.k. mixed bundling, bestående i att ett teleföretag erbjudit sina privatkunder en prisreduktion på fast telefoni under viss period förutsatt att dessa köper bredband från företaget, har lämnats utan bifall då det inte har visats att teleföretaget har en dominerande ställning.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Marknadsdomstolen, 2005."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/md-2005-29",
  "softwareVersion": "8095d6d0af817c08",
  "citation": "avgorande-md-2005-29, MD 2005:29, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/md-2005-29 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:b92ba21fadbc34f1, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/md-2005-29/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:a9f69a9a3fb8bbec669ab8425716d810795255b680363fbee8664c99468b4207",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:a9f69a9a3fb8bbec669ab8425716d810795255b680363fbee8664c99468b4207",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T07:05:32.695Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/md-2005-29",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}