{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2022-52",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:96c692d5135eb7fd1f5e6b32f99011d2f36793d2026dda1c7e3ea22282573614",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "HFD 2022 ref. 52, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-hfd-2022-52",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2022-52",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "HFD 2022 ref. 52, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: En syntetisk option som en anställd förvärvar från arbetsgivaren kan behandlas som värdepapper vid beskattningen, även om arbetsgivaren har rätt att återköpa optionen till marknadsvärde om den anställde lämnar sin anställning.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen, 2022. Tillämpar Inkomstskattelagen."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2022-52",
  "softwareVersion": "c3cc287a895e5fd4",
  "citation": "avgorande-hfd-2022-52, HFD 2022 ref. 52, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2022-52 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:a6e207b9ed7d4c6b, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/hfd-2022-52/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:96c692d5135eb7fd1f5e6b32f99011d2f36793d2026dda1c7e3ea22282573614",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:96c692d5135eb7fd1f5e6b32f99011d2f36793d2026dda1c7e3ea22282573614",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T11:59:58.498Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2022-52",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}