{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2022-30",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:b90c5d0523edf914b90bc4dae727661a11ad822ea4ee7caeeefa025e4df7caf9",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "HFD 2022 ref. 30, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-hfd-2022-30",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2022-30",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "HFD 2022 ref. 30, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: En leverantör vars anbud rätteligen har förkastats av den upphandlande myndigheten till följd av att anbudet inte har uppfyllt ett visst obligatoriskt krav, kan inte anses ha lidit eller kunnat komma att lida skada till följd av brister i utformningen av andra obligatoriska krav.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen, 2022. Tillämpar LOU."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2022-30",
  "softwareVersion": "a912ea99e104aac1",
  "citation": "avgorande-hfd-2022-30, HFD 2022 ref. 30, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2022-30 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:ed04324282ba9827, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/hfd-2022-30/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:b90c5d0523edf914b90bc4dae727661a11ad822ea4ee7caeeefa025e4df7caf9",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:b90c5d0523edf914b90bc4dae727661a11ad822ea4ee7caeeefa025e4df7caf9",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T09:08:48.759Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2022-30",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}