{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2022-26",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:93b593d3dfa94c3f66486680bbef42e4eb5c7eb83c6ed23b82c33b56de108434",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "HFD 2022 ref. 26, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-hfd-2022-26",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2022-26",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "HFD 2022 ref. 26, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: En socialnämnd är inte skyldig att vid prövningen av om en person har rätt till försörjningsstöd ta hänsyn till ersättning som skulle ha utgått om personen hade sökt andra bidrag, s.k. fiktiv inkomst.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen, 2022."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2022-26",
  "softwareVersion": "e26ad4ba3af1dc8a",
  "citation": "avgorande-hfd-2022-26, HFD 2022 ref. 26, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2022-26 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:634a3c50b9d286a3, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/hfd-2022-26/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:93b593d3dfa94c3f66486680bbef42e4eb5c7eb83c6ed23b82c33b56de108434",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:93b593d3dfa94c3f66486680bbef42e4eb5c7eb83c6ed23b82c33b56de108434",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T12:03:15.816Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2022-26",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}