{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2022-2",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:527f36a76d27bb5ea5aec2fb155912f859ce390527ceaf1fe4ec407efcacc9de",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "HFD 2022 ref. 2, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-hfd-2022-2",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2022-2",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "HFD 2022 ref. 2, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Anstånd med betalning av överskjutande ingående mervärdesskatt som tidigare tillgodoräknats den skattskyldige får inte vägras på den grunden att det inte finns någon mervärdesskatt att betala för den redovisningsperiod som den ingående mervärdesskatten avser.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen, 2022. Tillämpar Skatteförfarandelagen."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2022-2",
  "softwareVersion": "4be33df79e426ded",
  "citation": "avgorande-hfd-2022-2, HFD 2022 ref. 2, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2022-2 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:6472187a1fd0dd3a, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/hfd-2022-2/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:527f36a76d27bb5ea5aec2fb155912f859ce390527ceaf1fe4ec407efcacc9de",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:527f36a76d27bb5ea5aec2fb155912f859ce390527ceaf1fe4ec407efcacc9de",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T07:11:45.331Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2022-2",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}