{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2021-56",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:6c0b4d4240c540696a61b539ff13aba88b9ec3f2a73291c719c3b264721ec498",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "HFD 2021 ref. 56, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-hfd-2021-56",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2021-56",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "HFD 2021 ref. 56, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Försäkringskassan har inte haft rätt att neka utbetalning av assistansersättning enbart på den grunden att en personlig assistents redovisade arbetstid översteg assistentens arbetsförmåga enligt ett beslut om sjukersättning.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen, 2021. Tillämpar Socialförsäkringsbalken."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2021-56",
  "softwareVersion": "f9bd6c3a373b79d5",
  "citation": "avgorande-hfd-2021-56, HFD 2021 ref. 56, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2021-56 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:f2ffa51b7883966e, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/hfd-2021-56/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:6c0b4d4240c540696a61b539ff13aba88b9ec3f2a73291c719c3b264721ec498",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:6c0b4d4240c540696a61b539ff13aba88b9ec3f2a73291c719c3b264721ec498",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T06:10:23.952Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2021-56",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}