{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2019-69",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:9489d9ee22573f04fb0154b877aafb72defbd7494fe08b0e25d7e4a98208459c",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "HFD 2019 ref. 69, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-hfd-2019-69",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2019-69",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "HFD 2019 ref. 69, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Vid prövningen av rätt till sjukersättning ska inte bortses från rehabiliteringsåtgärder av det skälet att de bedöms kunna förbättra arbetsförmågan först efter det att den försäkrade har fyllt 65 år.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen, 2019. Tillämpar Socialförsäkringsbalken."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2019-69",
  "softwareVersion": "57da54202391ea87",
  "citation": "avgorande-hfd-2019-69, HFD 2019 ref. 69, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2019-69 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:973e47c11a8700e5, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/hfd-2019-69/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:9489d9ee22573f04fb0154b877aafb72defbd7494fe08b0e25d7e4a98208459c",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:9489d9ee22573f04fb0154b877aafb72defbd7494fe08b0e25d7e4a98208459c",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T06:06:23.993Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2019-69",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}