{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2019-66",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:d488ca8fbadff3db1c38174d5cd60502005288b3fb45418f56bc56b769962eae",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "HFD 2019 ref. 66, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-hfd-2019-66",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2019-66",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "HFD 2019 ref. 66, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: En anmälan från en läkare där det endast anges att en patient av medicinska skäl är olämplig att inneha skjutvapen har ansetts utgöra ett tillräckligt underlag för ett beslut att omhänderta patientens skjutvapen.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen, 2019. Tillämpar Förvaltningslagen."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2019-66",
  "softwareVersion": "2078ac37b541acf1",
  "citation": "avgorande-hfd-2019-66, HFD 2019 ref. 66, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2019-66 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:63ca64df4229fdc8, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/hfd-2019-66/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:d488ca8fbadff3db1c38174d5cd60502005288b3fb45418f56bc56b769962eae",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:d488ca8fbadff3db1c38174d5cd60502005288b3fb45418f56bc56b769962eae",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T08:15:52.908Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2019-66",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}