{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2018-67",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:4dd6df0362968d37a295a5227cac47dcd4c14b98b68782b9157115e6a938a31a",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "HFD 2018 ref. 67, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-hfd-2018-67",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2018-67",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "HFD 2018 ref. 67, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Vid bedömningen av storleken på den upphandlingsskadeavgift som ska betalas på grund av att en kommunal nämnd har genomfört en otillåten direktupphandling har det inte ansetts vara en försvårande omständighet att en annan nämnd i samma kommun tidigare har gjort sig skyldig till en sådan överträdelse.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen, 2018."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2018-67",
  "softwareVersion": "fbe7be97f77e9f86",
  "citation": "avgorande-hfd-2018-67, HFD 2018 ref. 67, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2018-67 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:85562b9db4b291ea, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/hfd-2018-67/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:4dd6df0362968d37a295a5227cac47dcd4c14b98b68782b9157115e6a938a31a",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:4dd6df0362968d37a295a5227cac47dcd4c14b98b68782b9157115e6a938a31a",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T07:11:07.783Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2018-67",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}