{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2017-66",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:dad4a800215bd14cdc90a7b75f9d7692d42b9e9c52a4339b1ea396bbef9c0d8c",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "HFD 2017 ref. 66, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-hfd-2017-66",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2017-66",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "HFD 2017 ref. 66, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Beslut av regeringen om att en statlig myndighet ska inleda sin verksamhet vid en viss tidpunkt har inte ansetts berättiga en upphandlande myndighet att underlåta annonsering med stöd av bestämmelsen om synnerlig brådska.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen, 2017."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2017-66",
  "softwareVersion": "b05fec0ac8f19423",
  "citation": "avgorande-hfd-2017-66, HFD 2017 ref. 66, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2017-66 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:addd1f986345a847, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/hfd-2017-66/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:dad4a800215bd14cdc90a7b75f9d7692d42b9e9c52a4339b1ea396bbef9c0d8c",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:dad4a800215bd14cdc90a7b75f9d7692d42b9e9c52a4339b1ea396bbef9c0d8c",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T07:06:29.141Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2017-66",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}