{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2017-60",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:c2af27c554498b0e84476c98a4fa0702af4c610c87311effad2e330f258d5217",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "HFD 2017 ref. 60, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-hfd-2017-60",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2017-60",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "HFD 2017 ref. 60, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Ett interimistiskt beslut om s.k. avtalsspärr i ett mål om offentlig upphandling har upphävts då den skada och de olägenheter som beslutet medför för den upphandlande myndigheten bedömts vara större än skadan för leverantören av att beslutet upphävs.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen, 2017."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2017-60",
  "softwareVersion": "1b6b9b3d3abe17a2",
  "citation": "avgorande-hfd-2017-60, HFD 2017 ref. 60, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2017-60 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:b9b1977878a7aca5, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/hfd-2017-60/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:c2af27c554498b0e84476c98a4fa0702af4c610c87311effad2e330f258d5217",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:c2af27c554498b0e84476c98a4fa0702af4c610c87311effad2e330f258d5217",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T12:55:49.406Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2017-60",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}