{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2016-76",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:3446dd912de5aa511474798ac7bb4f9f3b37a446b0da25982ff784fc0b8c6f82",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "HFD 2016 ref. 76, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-hfd-2016-76",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2016-76",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "HFD 2016 ref. 76, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: De inskränkningar i en fastighetsägares förfoganderätt som ett beslut om utvidgat strandskydd medför har inte ansetts innebära en oproportionerlig begränsning av dennes möjligheter att fortsatt bedriva skogsbruk eller annars nyttja fastigheterna.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen, 2016."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2016-76",
  "softwareVersion": "b8fc9f73493c489c",
  "citation": "avgorande-hfd-2016-76, HFD 2016 ref. 76, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2016-76 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:6f140c8bec633851, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/hfd-2016-76/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:3446dd912de5aa511474798ac7bb4f9f3b37a446b0da25982ff784fc0b8c6f82",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:3446dd912de5aa511474798ac7bb4f9f3b37a446b0da25982ff784fc0b8c6f82",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T07:01:41.890Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2016-76",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}