{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2016-44",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:490419ef2686cb8903ab028a9ae73cdb9fe106683358dea512bc2ef2c8b9128c",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "HFD 2016 ref. 44, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-hfd-2016-44",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2016-44",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "HFD 2016 ref. 44, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Fortsatta beslut om tvångsvård av en patient som dömts till rättspsykiatrisk vård med särskild utskrivningsprövning men som varit avviken sedan mycket lång tid, har inte ansetts proportionerliga.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen, 2016."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2016-44",
  "softwareVersion": "05486bac2cd43680",
  "citation": "avgorande-hfd-2016-44, HFD 2016 ref. 44, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2016-44 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:ff229e63ec3449d3, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/hfd-2016-44/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:490419ef2686cb8903ab028a9ae73cdb9fe106683358dea512bc2ef2c8b9128c",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:490419ef2686cb8903ab028a9ae73cdb9fe106683358dea512bc2ef2c8b9128c",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T07:07:23.332Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2016-44",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}