{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2016-37",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:125ad571a11a2fe40a449545105cf6f49f08c9b417c56b142f2a17aea66e6ec5",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "HFD 2016 ref. 37, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-hfd-2016-37",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2016-37",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "HFD 2016 ref. 37, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Vid en prövning mot de allmänna principerna för offentlig upphandling har, framförallt med hänsyn till likabehandlingsprincipen, en upphandlande myndighet ansetts ha handlat rätt när den förkastat ett anbud som inte uppfyllt ett obligatoriskt krav (I) och felaktigt när myndigheten godtagit ett anbud med bortseende från ett sådant krav (II).",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen, 2016."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2016-37",
  "softwareVersion": "5034a6674c406d22",
  "citation": "avgorande-hfd-2016-37, HFD 2016 ref. 37, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2016-37 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:3f549ef7d037b35e, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/hfd-2016-37/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:125ad571a11a2fe40a449545105cf6f49f08c9b417c56b142f2a17aea66e6ec5",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:125ad571a11a2fe40a449545105cf6f49f08c9b417c56b142f2a17aea66e6ec5",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T07:05:06.711Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2016-37",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}