{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2016-30",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:781a905194c1bcabb83d2b9d03b5e582b6759b732a25f6d1df13e301d5af8375",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "HFD 2016 ref. 30, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-hfd-2016-30",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2016-30",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "HFD 2016 ref. 30, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: För ett offentligt biträde som är ett s.k. distansbiträde men som saknar rätt till ersättning för merkostnader, ska ersättning för tidsspillan och utlägg bestämmas utifrån samma schablon som tillämpas för en offentlig försvarare i motsvarande situation.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen, 2016."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2016-30",
  "softwareVersion": "fb152f39678f9335",
  "citation": "avgorande-hfd-2016-30, HFD 2016 ref. 30, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2016-30 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:28523afcad2720bd, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/hfd-2016-30/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:781a905194c1bcabb83d2b9d03b5e582b6759b732a25f6d1df13e301d5af8375",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:781a905194c1bcabb83d2b9d03b5e582b6759b732a25f6d1df13e301d5af8375",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T08:10:37.285Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2016-30",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}