{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2013-55",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:8cf46a06882d0f0528ba22cd43b2121b7c8366ed06015e12c4171dcc4865e9d6",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "HFD 2013 ref. 55, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-hfd-2013-55",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2013-55",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "HFD 2013 ref. 55, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Ett beslut att inte meddela prövningstillstånd för en klagande hindrar inte domstolen att ta ställning till om prövningstillstånd ska meddelas beträffande en annan klagandes överklagande av samma underrättsavgörande.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen, 2013."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2013-55",
  "softwareVersion": "907079565e155cdc",
  "citation": "avgorande-hfd-2013-55, HFD 2013 ref. 55, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2013-55 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:275277afaa9978d7, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/hfd-2013-55/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:8cf46a06882d0f0528ba22cd43b2121b7c8366ed06015e12c4171dcc4865e9d6",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:8cf46a06882d0f0528ba22cd43b2121b7c8366ed06015e12c4171dcc4865e9d6",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T07:15:28.290Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2013-55",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}