{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2012-12",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:c82affdf399d1c3bc204d26d00b2abfe460cbdd395cf33ebeb8a137c3bfb3e7e",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "HFD 2012 ref. 12, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-hfd-2012-12",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2012-12",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "HFD 2012 ref. 12, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Beslut av Skatteverket om s.k. generell tredjemansrevision hos bank för att hämta in uppgifter på klientmedelskonton har ansetts oproportionerligt eftersom det saknas effektiva möjligheter att från granskning undanta uppgifter om vad advokaters klientuppdrag avser.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen, 2012."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2012-12",
  "softwareVersion": "ae42900647c00df9",
  "citation": "avgorande-hfd-2012-12, HFD 2012 ref. 12, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2012-12 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:cecade65edb486f8, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/hfd-2012-12/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:c82affdf399d1c3bc204d26d00b2abfe460cbdd395cf33ebeb8a137c3bfb3e7e",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:c82affdf399d1c3bc204d26d00b2abfe460cbdd395cf33ebeb8a137c3bfb3e7e",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T06:02:54.046Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2012-12",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}