{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2011-14",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:9564dbdb66b4267bca11139349a8fcae49388ab2268a88d04ed969fa8ff74a7b",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "HFD 2011 ref. 14, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-hfd-2011-14",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2011-14",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "HFD 2011 ref. 14, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: En domare har inte ansetts jävig att handlägga ett mål rörande inkomsttaxering och skattetillägg enbart på den grunden att han tidigare prövat frågan om anstånd med att betala den aktuella skatten.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen, 2011."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2011-14",
  "softwareVersion": "93c9653793dde47c",
  "citation": "avgorande-hfd-2011-14, HFD 2011 ref. 14, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2011-14 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:d5aa1f48e9d56843, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/hfd-2011-14/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:9564dbdb66b4267bca11139349a8fcae49388ab2268a88d04ed969fa8ff74a7b",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:9564dbdb66b4267bca11139349a8fcae49388ab2268a88d04ed969fa8ff74a7b",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T06:04:14.814Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2011-14",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}