{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2024-54",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:6746c1944418f427181490a29300f435135ed2210388dd0d0ec660b66f6e953d",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "AD 2024 nr 54, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-ad-2024-54",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2024-54",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "AD 2024 nr 54, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Målet gällde brott mot förhandlingsskyldigheten.",
    "Vad domstolen sa: Domen innebar att kärandens talan bifölls på grund av att svaranden underlåtit att ange sin inställning till byggsyndikatets krav och inte heller angett några skäl för bestridandet, som kan vara av betydelse vid prövning av saken.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Arbetsdomstolen, 2024."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2024-54",
  "softwareVersion": "f35a3f0a5a6a2870",
  "citation": "avgorande-ad-2024-54, AD 2024 nr 54, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2024-54 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:1c7051551e7fc3af, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/ad-2024-54/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:6746c1944418f427181490a29300f435135ed2210388dd0d0ec660b66f6e953d",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:6746c1944418f427181490a29300f435135ed2210388dd0d0ec660b66f6e953d",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T11:04:45.977Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2024-54",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}