{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2023-21",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:4fb1b251028d216f229f7a443efbec36cb7b8aa1a79e4bbf819f39d5f688ef44",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "AD 2023 nr 21, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-ad-2023-21",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2023-21",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "Fråga om tingsrätten gjorde fel när den avvisade en stämningsansökan på grund av underlåtenhet att betala ansökningsavgift utan att utreda om det fanns förutsättningar för att överlämna målet till Arbetsdomstolen",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Arbetsdomstolen har funnit att det var fel av tingsrätten att avvisa kärandens stämningsansökan innan tingsrätten utrett behörighetsfrågan.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Arbetsdomstolen, 2023."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2023-21",
  "softwareVersion": "527bfc07bdbf9850",
  "citation": "avgorande-ad-2023-21, AD 2023 nr 21, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2023-21 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:b9bfdc486b9d20a8, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/ad-2023-21/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:4fb1b251028d216f229f7a443efbec36cb7b8aa1a79e4bbf819f39d5f688ef44",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:4fb1b251028d216f229f7a443efbec36cb7b8aa1a79e4bbf819f39d5f688ef44",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T06:58:56.584Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2023-21",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}