{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2022-45",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:e6e47dff920c9f756eedb7862776abcf460c32b05864421fdbf6ee92f99695fd",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "AD 2022 nr 45, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-ad-2022-45",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2022-45",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "AD 2022 nr 45, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Fråga om ett mopedbud, som arbetade för ett budföretag och tidigare varit tidsbegränsat anställt som cykelbud hos det företaget, fortfarande var anställt hos budföretaget eller behovsanställt hos ett bemanningsföretag och uthyrt till budföretaget.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Arbetsdomstolen, 2022."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2022-45",
  "softwareVersion": "450f0f4b4d91ec09",
  "citation": "avgorande-ad-2022-45, AD 2022 nr 45, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2022-45 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:97b9fda3a7d11733, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/ad-2022-45/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:e6e47dff920c9f756eedb7862776abcf460c32b05864421fdbf6ee92f99695fd",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:e6e47dff920c9f756eedb7862776abcf460c32b05864421fdbf6ee92f99695fd",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T10:05:20.804Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2022-45",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}