{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2021-17",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:c28d0925fa3d44984b0b862f58567e8c03e5533db6a0dcd539a0869762897a84",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "AD 2021 nr 17, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-ad-2021-17",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2021-17",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "AD 2021 nr 17, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Kollektivavtalstolkning.",
    "Vad domstolen sa: Arbetsdomstolen har funnit att arbetsgivaren inte brutit mot kollektivavtalet när arbetsgivaren för en arbetstagare inte återtog utläggningen av två extra ledighetsdagar, trots att arbetstagaren kom att bli sjuk de utlagda dagarna.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Arbetsdomstolen, 2021."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2021-17",
  "softwareVersion": "40a40a02a9816fee",
  "citation": "avgorande-ad-2021-17, AD 2021 nr 17, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2021-17 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:136c5dfecdd29b7c, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/ad-2021-17/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:c28d0925fa3d44984b0b862f58567e8c03e5533db6a0dcd539a0869762897a84",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:c28d0925fa3d44984b0b862f58567e8c03e5533db6a0dcd539a0869762897a84",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T12:06:09.371Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2021-17",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}