{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2020-34",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:ce4e84314ecc2a38749befbc8bf69397d914c38cf14c389e0f7b4f1e7ef6529b",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "AD 2020 nr 34, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-ad-2020-34",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2020-34",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "AD 2020 nr 34, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: En arbetsgivare som påstår att ett skriftligt anställningsavtal har upprättats för skens skull, har ansetts ha bevisbördan för att parterna varit överens om att avtalet inte ska tillämpas dem emellan.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Arbetsdomstolen, 2020. Tillämpar Avtalslagen."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2020-34",
  "softwareVersion": "6453221085c1b7a4",
  "citation": "avgorande-ad-2020-34, AD 2020 nr 34, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2020-34 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:d737641fbc4bbd80, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/ad-2020-34/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:ce4e84314ecc2a38749befbc8bf69397d914c38cf14c389e0f7b4f1e7ef6529b",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:ce4e84314ecc2a38749befbc8bf69397d914c38cf14c389e0f7b4f1e7ef6529b",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T07:18:19.954Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2020-34",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}