{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2020-33",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:ee715f085c2fe7db245402f90dab2db0b3b96df358a84bd9dbc637d37acc2aa3",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "AD 2020 nr 33, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-ad-2020-33",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2020-33",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "AD 2020 nr 33, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Kollektivavtalstolkning.",
    "Vad domstolen sa: Arbetsdomstolen har funnit att en arbetsgivare som ensidigt, dvs. utan att de lokala parterna träffat en överenskommelse om det, infört individuell prestationsbaserad lön, har brutit mot kollektivavtalet.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Arbetsdomstolen, 2020."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2020-33",
  "softwareVersion": "39ec3acbb660bb88",
  "citation": "avgorande-ad-2020-33, AD 2020 nr 33, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2020-33 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:a165b2b3d29fa284, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/ad-2020-33/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:ee715f085c2fe7db245402f90dab2db0b3b96df358a84bd9dbc637d37acc2aa3",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:ee715f085c2fe7db245402f90dab2db0b3b96df358a84bd9dbc637d37acc2aa3",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T06:08:11.405Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2020-33",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}