{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2016-49",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:ef120e589ec8072226cfc5e0e415968ae2434a6d4f30637a669bb49ecd02d240",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "AD 2016 nr 49, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-ad-2016-49",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2016-49",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "Fråga om ett bolags förfarande att på grund av med arbetstagare som fyllt 40 år träffade anställningsavtal med bestämmelser om 25 semesterdagar per år inte ge dem flera semesterdagar än så strider mot kollektivavtalet",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Kollektivavtalstolkning.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Arbetsdomstolen, 2016."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2016-49",
  "softwareVersion": "c464c3cb39dbda7f",
  "citation": "avgorande-ad-2016-49, AD 2016 nr 49, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2016-49 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:b8b41ae367aee548, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/ad-2016-49/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:ef120e589ec8072226cfc5e0e415968ae2434a6d4f30637a669bb49ecd02d240",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:ef120e589ec8072226cfc5e0e415968ae2434a6d4f30637a669bb49ecd02d240",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T06:57:22.312Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2016-49",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}