{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2013-8",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:9d4ccd81b2934eeeedf129c47e4523dce0594e95c6b36a38d5a42d6d4dcc146a",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "AD 2013 nr 8, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-ad-2013-8",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2013-8",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "AD 2013 nr 8, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Fråga om Arbetsdomstolen är behörig att som första instans ta upp och pröva en tvist om lönefordran, som uppstått hos en tidigare arbetsgivare som inte var bunden av kollektivavtal och vars verksamhet påstås ha övergått till nu instämd arbetsgivare.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Arbetsdomstolen, 2013."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2013-8",
  "softwareVersion": "45a8f348eeac2ed5",
  "citation": "avgorande-ad-2013-8, AD 2013 nr 8, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2013-8 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:d6907d59373f7bb8, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/ad-2013-8/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:9d4ccd81b2934eeeedf129c47e4523dce0594e95c6b36a38d5a42d6d4dcc146a",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:9d4ccd81b2934eeeedf129c47e4523dce0594e95c6b36a38d5a42d6d4dcc146a",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T06:05:55.863Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2013-8",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}