{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2006-65",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:7735c5bb4e7b94aaa1de40de90d18330cde79b01eb0040f51aec5e0ec87688b2",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "AD 2006 nr 65, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-ad-2006-65",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2006-65",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "Fråga om arbetsgivare gjort sig skyldiga till kollektivavtalsbrott",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Arbetsdomstolen har haft att ta ställning till om markarbeten som utförts på två arbetsplatser skulle ha anmälts enligt anläggningsavtalets huvudregel om arbetsplatsanmälan eller om det undantag som gäller varit tillämpligt.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Arbetsdomstolen, 2006."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2006-65",
  "softwareVersion": "7c7e2565cd7d164c",
  "citation": "avgorande-ad-2006-65, AD 2006 nr 65, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2006-65 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:a42eb20fcae48404, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/ad-2006-65/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:7735c5bb4e7b94aaa1de40de90d18330cde79b01eb0040f51aec5e0ec87688b2",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:7735c5bb4e7b94aaa1de40de90d18330cde79b01eb0040f51aec5e0ec87688b2",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T11:57:52.942Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2006-65",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}