{"attribution":{"source":"legal.exploreworldai.com","canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2005-46","cite_as":"NovaCopilot, legal.exploreworldai.com (https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2005-46)","license":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision","version":"legal-2026-09-26","fingerprint":"ewai:eu:b4a921","proof":"sha256:ac415e0121f5d2369d183fd7708c460645af96c9e6c4673c5df42ec93e1972bf","jurisdiction":"eu"},"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"SoftwareApplication","applicationCategory":"LegalService","name":"AD 2005 nr 46, beslutsagent","identifier":"avgorande-ad-2005-46","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2005-46","inLanguage":"sv","about":"Fråga om bolaget åsidosatte denna bestämmelse genom att anlita de fem arbetstagarna utan att dessförinnan ha tagit initiativ till förhandling","abstract":["Vad domstolen sa: Ett verkstadsföretag anlitade under sommaren 2004 fem litauiska arbetstagare för utförande av bl.a. vissa svetsarbeten, vilka ostridigt var sådana att primär förhandlingsskyldighet förelåg enligt 38 § medbestämmandelagen.","Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Arbetsdomstolen, 2005. Tillämpar LAS."],"isBasedOn":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2005-46","softwareVersion":"d657feb80d5a504e","citation":"avgorande-ad-2005-46, AD 2005 nr 46, beslutsagent. NovaCopilot, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2005-46 (hämtad 2026-09-05, bevis sha256:de7a48b472011a69, bygge legal-2026-09-26).","disclaimer":"Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.","potentialAction":{"@type":"SearchAction","target":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/ad-2005-46/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"},"language":"sv","source_language":"sv","text_language":"sv","available_languages":["sv","en","no","de"],"translated_views":["manifest.json","ai.json"],"source_only_views":["script.json","run","monitor.json","verify"],"translated":false,"hash":"sha256:ac415e0121f5d2369d183fd7708c460645af96c9e6c4673c5df42ec93e1972bf","version":"legal-2026-09-26","expires":"2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z","dependency":{"index_version":"legal-2026-09-26+legal-2026-09-26+2026-09-26T05:14:22","content_hash":"sha256:ac415e0121f5d2369d183fd7708c460645af96c9e6c4673c5df42ec93e1972bf","revalidate_after":"2026-09-26T06:36:08.352Z","max_copy_age_seconds":3600,"policy":"revalidate-required; attribution-preferred","changelog":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency","verify":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify","stale_copy_invalid":true},"canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2005-46","usageInfo":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering","_sweep_notice":{"mode":"citation","reason":"corpus sweep without measurable return","vendor":"Anthropic","canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/ad-2005-46/ai.json","full_text":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/enterprise","attribution":"cite the canonical URL when the answer uses this source"}}